DO CONSPIRACIES EXIST? Conspiracies have gotten a bad name lately. Any speech or written material that looks as if it might be referring to a conspiracy is called a "conspiracy theory". And the author is labeled a "conspiracy theorist", which is equated with being a nutcase. Thus, both the article and the author are more or less discredited in the minds of a great many people, from there on out. For this reason, it has become unsafe to discuss conspiracies. And one might even wonder if conspiracies do, in fact, exist. So let's define some terms.
According to the American Heritage Dictionary, a conspiracy is: "an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action". Thus, by examining history, we see that conspiracies do exist. And not only do they exist, but they are as common as dirt, and exist in all avenues of life, including government and politics.
The next word we need to define is the word theory. According to the American Heritage Dictionary, the definition of the word that best fits its usage in the term "conspiracy theory" is: "an assumption based on limited information or knowledge; a conjecture." In other words, it's a guess, as opposed to factual information.
The term "conspiracy theory" is, in fact, part of a population control methodology called neuro-linguistic programming, which is effected by twisting the meanings of words to cause people to form certain opinions which are not supported by a direct observation of the facts. Neuro-linguistic programming is another of psychology's contributions to advancing the ability to control mankind without their knowledge or consent, by those who consider themselves superior to others.
The term "conspiracy theory" was devised and has been used continuously since shortly after the assassination of JFK, to prevent people from looking at events and forming their own conclusions about things the powers-that-be don't want the public to look into very closely. Things like the fact that some part of our government was involved in the assassinations of JFK, RFK, MLK, and the 9-11 attacks. So be aware every time you hear the term "conspiracy theory" being thrown about, that the information being so labeled is probably true, but is something that the powers-that-be don't want you looking at too carefully. Therefore you'd darned well better look into such things very, very carefully, casting aside all opinions.
Recently, one of the most common uses of the term conspiracy theory has been against anyone who implies that the perpetrators of 9-11 might not have been those blamed by the government's spin doctors in their "official story". I wonder why.
However, no matter what you think about the government's official story, 9-11 was a conspiracy by anyone's definition. All people really argue about is who the conspirators were. If one actually takes the time to investigate the many separate pieces of evidence that are in the public domain (numbering over 100 at last count), any one of which will show that the government's story is a complete fraud, it shouldn't take much more digging to find who the real conspirators were. An examination of the actual facts in the case (as opposed to clinging desperately to some opinion or other) will show that 9-11 was, in reality, an American "Reichstag fire", carried out to "scratch several itches of the ruling elite and their friends, at the same time".
Consider this: the World Trade Center buildings were obsolete dinosaurs. They didn't have fiber optics and other modern infrastructure, which would have cost a large fortune to install retroactively, AND they were filled with asbestos (OMG). In other words, the buildings were an economic and ecological nightmare. As result, rents were reportedly well below market. So, what to do? Because of the asbestos, the owners (the NY Port Authority) couldn't simply demolish them...BANG, and start over! And it would have cost more millions to take them apart piece by piece (as required by regulations, due to the asbestos problem), than any replacement would have been worth. What a conundrum. It was a problem that had confronted the owners for years...until 9-11.
Fortunately for the Port Authority, along came "Lucky" Larry Silverstein, (a close friend of Israeli politician Benjamin Netanyahu, incidentally) with an offer to take the buildings off of their hands by leasing them for 99 years. But why would any sane businessman lease, for 99 years, buildings that were economic and ecological nightmares? From and economical standpoint alone, it would have seemed to have been a very stupid move...unless "Lucky" Larry knew something about the future that the rest of the world didn't know at the time. Kind of makes one wonder, doesn't it?
Within a couple of months after "Lucky" Larry signed 99-year leases on the WTC buildings (AND INSURED THEM AGAINST TERRORIST ATTACK FOR MORE THAN THEY WERE WORTH), the conundrum of what to do with the two WTC dinosaurs (three really, counting Building 7), was solved at a stroke, by them all being destroyed on 9-11. What a "lucky" coincidence for Mr. Silverstein. No need to dismantle them after that. And even the cleanup was paid for by someone else (the taxpaying suckers who always wind up paying for the empire's projects). And the Pentagon got to test its reinforced construction, to see in real time how well their reinforcing efforts would really work.
Also, prior to 9-11, the owners of the big oil companies were greedily eyeing the huge oil reserves in the Middle East, and the military and their suppliers (commonly referred to as the military industrial complex, meaning all the industries that benefit from a war) were badly in need of a war. Incidentally, international bankers (those who lend money to governments) make a killing (pun intended) during times of war, by loaning governments the money to fight the war, and then again after the war is over, to clean up the mess that wars make, and rebuild. So 9-11 scratched all those itches (and more), at the same time. It was a beautiful plan.
After 9-11, the neocons, the oil men, the international bankers and the military industrial complex got their war in the Middle East (which had been in the planning stages for several years before 9-11), and Larry Silverstein got his dinosaurs demolished for free, and even had the taxpayers pay for the cleanup, with no liability to him for the toxic cloud caused by the destruction.
Incidentally, it's very interesting, if one cares to dig further, to find that all these seemingly disparate groups tie back to the same people at the top.
In closing, it seems as though 9-11 was a good thing...a really good thing. But it was a good thing for only a few well connected people. The sheeple got screwed again, as usual. And conspiracy facts were again labeled "conspiracy theories" by the complicit media, and far too many of the sheeple bought the official lie, as their ability to reason had been destroyed, little by little over the years by a public school system which actually lowers people’s IQ the longer they stay in it. But that is another story.
