|
  |
|
|
Conspiracy Facts vs Conspiracy Theory
Soon after 9-11 I was asked why someone would do something like that, the "someone" referring, of course, to the Middle Eastern people that the official story implicated as being responsible for the attack.
If one mentions that the government's official 9-11 story was impossible, one gets immediately attacked and called a "conspiracy theorist", and any further information one offers, is labelled a "conspiracy theory" to discredit it. However, let's be clear on this. Since we know for certain that more than one person was involved in the 9-11 attacks, and since it was most definitely a criminal endeavor, the offical story is a conspiracy theory by any definition, and an impossible conspiracy theory at that. So that leaves, as the only question yet to be fully answered, "who were those conspirators" and what was their motive. Consider this: Part of the official story is that the airplane crashes and the resulting fires brought down 2 steel frame buildings. However, any engineer will tell you that steel structure buildings will not and cannot collapse completely, all the way to the ground because of an open hydrocarbon fire, especially not into their own footprint. It's structurally impossible for it to happen that way. An airplane crash into a building could, possibly, cause the collapse of one or two floors--but not the whole building down to the ground, with nothing left standing. And it couldn't break hundreds of the external steel bands and HEAVY internal support columns into 30 foot sections, as was the case with both buildings 1 and 2. Also, in terms of the physical and gravitational laws of this universe, the collapses were much too fast for any spontaneous, collapse, unaided by internal demolition charges.
Understand that the whole building was surrounded by vertical steel bands that were welded and bolted together, much like a screen, and supported inside by many HEAVY steel columns. The mere fact that most of those hundreds of bands were broken into 30 foot sections, along with ALL the interior support columns--all the way to the ground--means that it was not a result of airplane impact and fire. That could not have happened without explosives having been attached to those columns. Open fires cannot break steel like that. Try bending your fireplace grate after burning logs on it for hours. Won't work, will it? It takes over 1000 degree F to melt or deform steel, and open fires can't get nearly that hot. But even if some of the columns had collapsed from the impact and ensuing fire (which could not have happened either--but say that it did), said collapse would have to have been up near the impact, and could not have collapsed the rest of the building--especially not in the 10 seconds that it took for it to collapse clear to the ground--unless one changes all the laws of physics.
Assuming that it were even possible for the collapse of one or two floors to cause the complete collapse of the building, each floor that collapsed would encounter resistance, and that would slow the fall considerably. But the fall was not slowed. Careful calculations, derived from the videos of the collapses shows that all the buildings collapsed at about the rate of free fall of an object dropped from the top of the building. Then look at the video of the building 7 collapse. That's a demolition collapse by anyone's estimation. Buildings don't collapse symetrically into their own footprint by themselves like it did. It's physically impossible without demo charges taking out the support columns first. Also, the firefighters, who are supreme experts on building fires, did not even consider that building collapse was a possibility. They considered the fires as "controllable", no big deal fires. That's why so many of them were killed. They knew that fires and airplane crashes don't bring down buildings. They knew that. For another look at the impossibility of the government's conspiracy theory, on 9/11/01 three skyscrapers totally collapsed, with fire given by the official story as the sole or primary cause. Fires and bombings have never before or since caused steel-frame buildings to collapse--so this was a first. And it happened not just once, but three times. And one of those buildings [building 7] did not even suffer an airplane crash. Do you believe in magic? If you still believe that the crash and ensuing fires were the cause of the building collapses, then you MUST believe in magic. Check out http://911research.wtc7.net/ for more information on the above. Another dagger in the official 9-11 story was the real-time BBC report of the collapse of Building 7, 20 or so minutes before it came down. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s which shows a live picture of the commentator with a real time view of Building 7 still standing in the background, while she's telling us that it already fell. A written version of this can be found at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49f_1172526096 Obviously the government's story is false. Any mediumly intelligent person would know that, after a brief look at even part of the actual evidence. So then one has to ask, why they continue to insist that their impossible story is the truth, while vicously attacking anyone who challenges it (unless, of course, they were involved). |
|
 |
|
PLEASE VISIT THE CONTRIBUTOR'S WEBSITE
No reactions yet.
Please login or sign up to rate this intel.
Please login or sign up to add a comment.
The copyright for this content entitled "Conspiracy Facts vs Conspiracy Theory" has been specified by the contributor as:
All Rights Reserved
This content may not be copied, distributed or adapted by anyone under any circumstances.
|
|
|
This intel was contributed by kenkem
|
May, 2012
2008
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2009
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2010
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2011
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2012
January, February, March, April, May
|
|
Not a member yet?
Qondio is a powerful network for making it online. If you have a website to
promote, we can help.
Sign up and get in on the action.
|
|
Welcome to Qondio! Discover the awesome power this network can deliver by going to our About page. Or you could skip straight to the Sign Up form.
|
|
